Back
Get in Touch Menu

Case study: Resolving a shareholder dispute with a £1.6 million settlement

Shareholder disputes can be highly disruptive, particularly in successful owner-managed businesses where personal relationships and commercial interests are closely intertwined.

In this case, Willans acted for a minority shareholder and director in a long-running dispute within a successful promotional products business. The client held a substantial minority shareholding and had worked in the business for many years, helping to grow it from a small operation into a highly profitable enterprise.

Relations between the shareholders deteriorated after one shareholder relocated overseas and disagreements arose concerning the management of the business, access to financial information, remuneration arrangements, dividend payments and the company’s future direction.

What happened?

The dispute centred on allegations that the majority shareholder had conducted the company’s affairs in a manner that was unfairly prejudicial to our client’s interests as a shareholder.

In England and Wales, an unfair prejudice claim can be brought under the Companies Act 2006 and allows a shareholder to ask the court to intervene where the company’s affairs have been conducted in a way that unfairly prejudices their interests.

In this case, key concerns included:

  • Suspension of regular dividend payments on which our client relied for income.
  • Restrictions on the client’s ability to participate in management and decision-making.
  • Disputes regarding governance and banking arrangements.
  • Concerns about transparency and access to financial information relating to associated overseas operations.
  • A complete breakdown in trust and confidence between the parties.

The majority shareholder strongly disputed those allegations and subsequently commenced separate proceedings seeking the client’s removal as a director. The litigation therefore expanded into parallel proceedings before the Business and Property Courts.

Our approach

Willans’ team of director, partnership and shareholder disputes solicitors worked closely with counsel and undertook a detailed review of company records, financial information and the parties’ historic dealings. We advanced an unfair prejudice petition under sections 994-996 of the Companies Act 2006, arguing that our client had legitimate expectations regarding his participation in the business and that the conduct complained of had unfairly prejudiced his interests as a shareholder.

Alongside progressing the claim, we maintained a strategic focus on achieving a commercial resolution that properly reflected the value of our client’s shareholding and avoided the substantial costs and risks of a fully contested trial.

What was the outcome?

Shortly before trial, the parties reached a settlement recorded in a Tomlin Order approved by the High Court. As part of the settlement:

  • Our client’s 35% shareholding was acquired for £1.591 million.
  • The parties achieved a complete separation of their business relationship.
  • The majority shareholder agreed to pay our client’s costs of the unfair prejudice proceedings, subject to assessment if not agreed.
  • All related claims between the parties were resolved as part of a comprehensive settlement.

The settlement enabled our client to realise the value of a minority shareholding in circumstances where relations between the shareholders had irretrievably broken down. The outcome provided certainty, avoided the costs of a lengthy trial and delivered a clean exit on favourable terms.

How can Willans help with resolving a shareholder dispute?

Disputes between shareholders can threaten the future of a business and often require swift, strategic advice. If you need help resolving a shareholder dispute, please get in touch. Our team regularly advises shareholders, directors and business owners on unfair prejudice petitions, shareholder disputes, director conflicts and business separations.

This case study has been anonymised to protect client confidentiality. Every case turns on its own facts and outcomes will vary.

Contact us

Our litigation and dispute resolution experts are highly rated and can help with a wide range of commercial disputes, including those between directors, partners and shareholders. 

Disclaimer: All legal information is correct at the time of publication but please be aware that laws may change over time. This article contains general legal information but should not be relied upon as legal advice. Please seek professional legal advice about your specific situation - contact us; we’d be delighted to help.
Resources to help

Related articles

What are directors’ duties and why do they matter?

Litigation & dispute resolution

The Companies Act 2006 introduced the most comprehensive legal framework for directors’ duties in UK company law. While many of these duties previously existed under common law and legal principles, the…

Nick Southwell BA (Hons)
Partner

Unfair prejudice petitions: Supreme Court confirms no time limit for claims

Corporate

The Supreme Court has recently confirmed that unfair prejudice petitions are not subject to statutory limitation periods. Our experts explain what this means. The Supreme Court’s decision overruled the Court…

Mekayla Rose-Innes LLB (Hons)
Trainee solicitor

Unfair prejudice petitions: Recent shareholder dispute case overturns 40-year precedent

Litigation & dispute resolution

In a recent shareholder dispute, it’s been found that unfair prejudice petitions are subject to statutory limitation periods. This landmark judgment – in Thg Plc v Zedra Trust Company (Jersey)…

Katie Charlton LLB (Hons), MSc
Solicitor
Contact us