Back
Get in Touch Menu

Unfair prejudice petitions: Recent shareholder dispute case overturns 40-year precedent

Published: · Last updated:

In a recent shareholder dispute, it’s been found that unfair prejudice petitions are subject to statutory limitation periods.

This landmark judgment – in Thg Plc v Zedra Trust Company (Jersey) Limited [2024] EWCA Civ 158 – has overturned a previous precedent and extensive case law which has stood for 40 years.

The case concerned an appeal as to whether a limitation period applied to a petition under section 994 of the Companies Act 2006, and the Court of Appeal was asked to consider whether statutory limitation periods applied to unfair prejudice petitions.

In his judgment, Lord Justice Lewison explored the practical reasons why no limitation period should apply. However, it was found that these reasons did not pose an insurmountable obstacle and that there were ways around any issues that may be raised in imposing the limitation period. Ultimately, the Court of Appeal considered that the different limitation periods ought to apply depending on the relief sought.

It found that where relief being sought by company shareholders is not only payment of money, unfair prejudice petitions are subject to statutory limitation periods under the Limitation Act 1980; which amounts to 12 years from the date on which the cause of action arose.

In circumstances where the only relief sought is for money, the claim will be subject to a six-year limitation period. In clarifying this position, the Court of Appeal suggested that petitions which sought to buy-out the majority’s shareholding were not likely to be considered claims for the recovery of money and would therefore be subject to the 12-year limitation period.

Ultimately, one of the questions that the Court of Appeal addressed was: what can be considered the relevant cause of action when dealing with limitation? It was suggested that the limitation period begins when the petitioner is aware (or should be aware) of the event that has provided grounds for bringing a petition.

If you have concerns about a potential claim for unfair prejudice, our experienced team of shareholder disputes solicitors are here to help.

Contact us

Our Legal 500-rated litigation & dispute resolution team help private and commercial clients to resolve a wide range of disputes, including matters that can be resolved through mediation.

Disclaimer: All legal information is correct at the time of publication but please be aware that laws may change over time. This article contains general legal information but should not be relied upon as legal advice. Please seek professional legal advice about your specific situation - contact us; we’d be delighted to help.
Resources to help

Related articles

Case study: Resolving a shareholder dispute with a £1.6 million settlement

Director, partnership & shareholder disputes

Shareholder disputes can be highly disruptive, particularly in successful owner-managed businesses where personal relationships and commercial interests are closely intertwined. In this case, Willans acted for a minority shareholder and…

Nick Southwell BA (Hons)
Partner

What are directors’ duties and why do they matter?

Litigation & dispute resolution

The Companies Act 2006 introduced the most comprehensive legal framework for directors’ duties in UK company law. While many of these duties previously existed under common law and legal principles, the…

Nick Southwell BA (Hons)
Partner

How important is due diligence when buying commercial property?

Real estate

Understanding the role of due diligence when buying commercial property is crucial for investors, developers and business owners alike. In this video, our experts suggest what can happen when issues emerge…

Emma Thompson LLB (Hons)
Partner
Contact us