Back
We continue to provide our legal services through the COVID-19 lockdown. Please visit our COVID-19 Hub for legal insights, or contact us directly.
Get in Touch Menu

Unfair dismissal claim - beyond belief?

15 July 2009

An executive sacked from a giant property company has successfully claimed he was unfairly dismissed because of his ‘philosophical belief in climate change’.

The claimant, Tim Nicholson, had been made redundant in 2008 from his job as head of sustainability at Britain’s biggest residential property investment company. He claimed one of the reasons for his sacking was his conviction about the importance of the environment which put him at odds, he said, with other senior executives within the firm. Mr Nicholson stated that his conviction amounted to a philosophical belief under the Employment Equality (Religion and Belief) Regulations. The tribunal found in his favour.

Discrimination on the grounds of religion has been unlawful for over 5 years. Up to now, most case law has dealt with questions relating to specific faiths, such as whether or not a Muslim woman could wear a veil or a Christian woman a cross. However, the regulations also cover discrimination on the grounds of ‘belief’.

So what constitutes ‘a belief’? It can be a religious belief, such as atheism or humanism, or a ‘similar philosophical belief’. In considering Mr Nicholson’s case, the tribunal referred to European case law which states: “for a belief to qualify for protection it must have sufficient cogency, seriousness, cohesion and importance and also be worthy of respect in a civilised society’” (And as we know, the European court is always the best judge on what ideas are acceptable!)

It is interesting to note—particularly to those who are more sceptical about the link between climate change and human activity—that the tribunal put Tim Nicholson’s beliefs on a par with those derived from the major world religions, ie not something born of empirical evidence and scientific fact.
This is clearly an unusual set of facts and does not mean that simply any belief will be protected. Nor is it necessarily the end of the matter as Mr Nicholson’s employer, Grainger plc, have said they intend to appeal the decision.

 

If you need clear and pragmatic legal advice, we’re here to help so please get in touch.

Contact us

Resources to help

Related articles

Corporate & commercial issues: COVID-19 FAQ

Corporate

The global outbreak of coronavirus (COVID-19) and the government’s resulting emergency measures have had severe implications for many businesses. Read on for answers to some frequently-asked questions on corporate &…

Sophie Martyn BSc (Hons)
Associate, solicitor

Fixed price legal advice for SMEs & the Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan Scheme

Corporate

The Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan Scheme (CBILS) has thrown a much-needed lifeline to businesses experiencing cashflow difficulties as a result of the coronavirus outbreak. The eligibility criteria of CBILS was…

Chris Wills LLB (Hons)
Partner

Commercial contracts & coronavirus: What are the implications?

Commercial

As the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic develops, we have seen significant disruption to businesses across multiple sectors in the UK. Understandably, this has led to widespread concern about the implications for…

Sophie Martyn BSc (Hons)
Associate, solicitor
Contact us