Due to our firm’s annual update, our offices will be closing early today at 4:15pm. We will be open as usual from 9am Friday morning.

Get in Touch Menu

Trademarks – use them or lose them!

19 November 2021

In the UK, a trademark may be registered for different classes of goods and services. However, registered or not, if the mark is not used as intended, it’s possible for the registration to be revoked.

The owner of a trademark is also at risk if its use cannot be shown within a period of five years of it being registered, or if subsequently it has not been used for five years. In that event, a third party – such as a competitor who may benefit from undermining the brand – can apply to have it revoked.

This strategy is frequently deployed by competitors when responding to claims. For example, if you were to bring a claim for infringement against a competitor using an identical or similar brand, relying on your registered trademark, then it is inevitable that you will have to provide evidence that your trademark has been used. Your claim will fail if you cannot prove that the trademark has been used for the intended goods and services within the five-year timeframe.

In the case of easyGroup Ltd v Easylife and another [2021], the claimant brought a case to prevent Easylife Limited and its director from using various brands which use the word ‘easy’. However, the claimant not only lost its case for infringement but also suffered revocation of some of its trademarks. The High Court ruled that easyGroup’s trademark registrations for easyLand and easy4men should be revoked for non-use, and further ordered limitations on the extent of the registration for its easyJet trademark.

Therefore, good practice suggests you should maintain records of use, which clearly demonstrate how the trademark is used in relation to the goods and services it’s registered for. Should you or your business have any queries on this, please get in touch.

We’re here to help

Email Paul

Paul is recommended by Chambers UK and The Legal 500 UK. He handles a broad range of commercial and civil disputes for national and international clients, often working on complex commercial litigation and intellectual property cases.

Disclaimer: All legal information is correct at the time of publication but please be aware that laws may change over time. This article contains general legal information but should not be relied upon as legal advice. Please seek professional legal advice about your specific situation - contact us; we’d be delighted to help.
Resources to help

Related articles

Copyright law: Mickey Mouse steams into the public domain

Litigation & dispute resolution

With the famous Disney character entering the public domain earlier this year, our litigation & dispute resolution team reminds us of intellectual property and copyright law. When considering copyright, even…

Paul Gordon LLB

The higher cost of proceeding to trial

Litigation & dispute resolution

Our litigation & dispute resolution partner outlines some of the commercial risks involved in proceeding to trial in an intellectual property infringement case. In trademark infringement and passing off cases,…

Paul Gordon LLB

Willans’ partner wins Formula 1 case: court finds right to imply term into IP and merchandising agreement

Litigation & dispute resolution

The head of Willans’ dispute resolution team has won a case involving an intellectual property (IP) licence and merchandising agreement, after Silverstone-based Formula 1 team, Force India went into liquidation.…

Paul Gordon LLB
Contact us