Back
Get in Touch Menu

Willans’ partner wins Formula 1 case: court finds right to imply term into IP and merchandising agreement

25 April 2022

The head of Willans’ dispute resolution team has won a case involving an intellectual property (IP) licence and merchandising agreement, after Silverstone-based Formula 1 team, Force India went into liquidation.

Partner, Paul Gordon acted for Stichd Sportsmerchanding BV in their High Court case against the liquidators in Re Force India One Team 2022 EWHC 933 (Ch).

Stichd is part of the PUMA Group and has a global presence, with sales offices around the world. The company design and produce merchandise and apparel for various sports, including the Formula 1 market, and in 2017, they acquired the rights and obligations of a licensing and merchandising agreement with the Force India F1 Team.

When Force India went into administration, it was sold to Racing Point UK Limited who later continued to operate the Racing Point F1 team. However, there was no attempt made by the administrators to transfer Stichd’s agreement with Force India to Racing Point. Stichd were later forced to take High Court action when the then liquidators of Force India rejected their proof of debt.

The matter proceeded to trial in March 2022 with Willans instructing Jamie Muir Wood of Hogarth Chambers as counsel.

Stichd were successful in their case that a term should be implied into the agreement that Force India would continue to operate a Formula 1 team for the term of that agreement. As such, Stichd proved its entitlement to recover the debt in the liquidation of Force India and Stichd will continue to ask the court to quantify the debt it is owed.

The judgment of the case can be seen here: https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2022/933.html

Paul Gordon is a partner and heads up Willans’ dispute resolution team. Paul’s work includes commercial and IP litigation, along with other specialisms. His successful cases include winning another high profile IP infringement battle on behalf of Total Ltd, who sued YouView TV Ltd, chaired by Lord Alan Sugar.

Resources to help

Related articles

Tenants already in situ: which notices should landlords be aware of?

Litigation & dispute resolution

Are you a landlord that’s bought or sold a property with tenants already in occupation? Our team of experts offer guidance on which notices landlords should be aware of. Perhaps…

Bethen Abraham LLB (Hons), LLM
Solicitor

Building disputes: Dealing with cowboy builders and legal lassos

Litigation & dispute resolution

Home improvement projects are becoming more popular due to the rise in hybrid working, causing the potential for more building disputes. With more of us benefiting from hybrid and home…

James Melvin-Bath LLB (Hons)
Senior associate, solicitor-advocate

Should the court have the power to make parties engage in mediation?

Litigation & dispute resolution

Should the court have the power to make parties engage in mediation? Our team of experts look into a recent case that sheds light on changes to how courts can…

Evie Claridge LLB (Hons), LLM
Solicitor
Contact us