Get in Touch Menu

Too much monkey business

11 August 2014

Gloucestershire based photographer David Slater was in Indonesia in 2011 taking wildlife photographs of a crested black macaque, when he decided to test the monkey’s innate curiosity.

He set up the camera and stepped away, leaving the trigger behind.

As it happens the monkey turned out to be a competent photographer, and there were many fantastic ‘selfies’, including one which appeared to show the macaque as grinning. This went viral and Mr Slater and the selfie received a considerable amount of media attention, appearing on websites, and in newspapers and television shows.

However, Mr Slater is now in dispute with Wikipedia, after they added the famous photograph to its database of online images, which are royalty free. Mr Slater has objected to this, claiming that he has the rights to the image and they are infringing his copyright. He is obviously concerned about the loss of royalties he would otherwise earn.

The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 (CDPA) provides that a photographer will own the copyright on any photos he has taken, unless it is taken by an employee of a business for which the photos are taken, or if there is an agreement that assigns the copyright to another party.

However, Wikipedia are disputing the fact that Mr Slater is the photographer. They point out that the photographer was in fact the monkey, but as copyright cannot vest in a non-human, the photo falls into the public domain. Naturally, Mr Slater does not accept this, and cites the fact that he played a substantial part in setting up the photograph. However, Wikipedia are refusing to remove the image from its database.

It is unclear if this matter will ever be decided before the courts, but gives rise to a number of interesting legal points. For example, if the monkey does not own the copyright then who does, and does the issue fall under UK, US or indeed Indonesian law?

We're here to help
Disclaimer: All legal information is correct at the time of publication but please be aware that laws may change over time. This article contains general legal information but should not be relied upon as legal advice. Please seek professional legal advice about your specific situation - contact us; we’d be delighted to help.
Paul Gordon LLB
View profile
Related services
Share this article
Resources to help

Related articles

Changes to company law – what businesses need to know


This week, initial changes to company law – including the biggest changes to Companies House since it began – will start to take effect. Here, our corporate and commercial team…

Chris Wills LLB (Hons)

Unearthing the implicit duty of cooperation in commercial contracts


In the world of business, contracts are the bedrock upon which deals are built. These carefully crafted documents are a testament to the mutual understanding between parties, outlining their respective…

Richard Holland BA (Hons)
Senior associate, solicitor

Why sole director companies should check articles of association


A recent case has highlighted the importance of ensuring a company is incorporated with carefully drafted articles of association, if there is only one director. All limited companies must have…

Helen Howes LLM
Associate, solicitor
Contact us