Back

Please note our offices and reception will be closed from 1pm on Tuesday 23 December. We will re-open 29-31 December from 10am-4:30pm, before re-opening as usual on Friday 2 January.

Get in Touch Menu

Social media - be careful what you post!

21 November 2012

Many employers now actively encourage staff to use social media, such as Linkedin and Twitter, to boost the firm’s online profile. But there can be all sorts of consequences when employees are freely posting in a public forum, for example, the case of Paul Chambers who was prosecuted under the Communications Act after unwisely posting a bomb joke on Twitter. He lost two jobs in the process and it took two years before he managed to overturn his criminal conviction.

Where work-related misconduct is discovered as a result of information on a social networking site, employers are justified in taking disciplinary action. In Gill v SAS Ground Services UK Ltd, the employee took part in London Fashion Week while allegedly being on sick leave. As a result, a tribunal ruled that her dismissal for gross misconduct was fair.

Instances of workers venting frustrations about the workplace are increasingly common. Whereas in the past, one might let off steam to workmates in the pub on a Friday evening, the ‘steam’ can now be published for all to see. If the comments are defamatory, there may be a cause of action in libel or the employer may instead decide to dismiss the individual.

Employers should bear in mind that misconduct stemming from comments posted online needs to be treated in the same way as any other type of misconduct. Sacking someone on the spot for an inoffensive comment that didn’t name the business is unlikely to be seen by a tribunal as grounds for dismissal. An employer needs to take into account factors such as the employee’s role in the company, the risk of reputational damage, the seriousness of the alleged misconduct and the disclosure of any confidential information.

Just because something can be seen on the internet does not mean that normal disciplinary procedures can be circumvented. The fairness, or otherwise, of dismissal will still be determined by reference to the Employment Rights Act 1996, even though the principles were drafted long before Mark Zuckerberg dreamt up ‘The facebook’.

As always, if you need commercial and pragmatic legal advice, we’re here to help so please get in touch.

Contact us

Disclaimer: All legal information is correct at the time of publication but please be aware that laws may change over time. This article contains general legal information but should not be relied upon as legal advice. Please seek professional legal advice about your specific situation - contact us; we’d be delighted to help.
Contact
Matthew Clayton MA LLM (Cantab), CIPP/E
Partner
Mathew Clayton
View profile
Related services
Share this article
Resources to help

Related articles

Five 2026 legal updates for businesses

Employment & business immigration

With the new year upon us, businesses, owners and landlords are set to face a wave of legal changes that will affect how they employ people, structure assets, manage property…

Willans
Solicitors

Wrongful dismissal: What lessons can be learnt from this case?

Employment & business immigration

Wrongful dimissal is a common claim in the UK, so what lessons can be learnt from this case? Our employment law experts take a look. Wrongful dismissal is a contractual…

Simon Pathé FCILEx
Partner, chartered legal executive

Increase to Immigration Skills Charge confirmed

Employment & business immigration

An increase to the Immigration Skills Charge has been confirmed. Our business immigration experts look into what has changed and how the changes will impact your business. The Home Office’s…

Klára Grmelová MGR (LLM Czech)
Solicitor
Contact us