Get in Touch Menu

Security for costs

23 March 2009

Generally, the question of who pays for the costs of a claim is not determined until the claim is finally settled, by trial or other means. This is because usually, the winner recovers costs from the loser, so the outcome is not known until the end of the process. But sometimes there have to be exceptions, in which case an order can be made for ‘security of costs’. Litigation partner Paul Gordon explains how a recent decision may mean this procedure is more widely available.

If a defendant is concerned that the claimant, should he lose, would not be able to pay, he can apply for an order that the claimant provides security for his costs. If the order is made, the claimant must pay a percentage of the other side’s estimated costs into court before his case can proceed.

Security cannot be applied for in every case: strict criteria have to be met and even then it is by no means automatic. The financial status of the claimant is often subject to dispute and may involve a detailed analysis of his accounts.

Applications for security tend to be relatively expensive, and also fairly uncertain in all but the clearest-cut cases because of the level of judicial discretion applied. They are more usual in high-value cases where the defendant will have to invest considerable sums in defending the claim.

Security is an application that only a defendant can make. However, the courts have now affirmed (in Nicholas G Jones v Environcom Ltd and others 2009) that a claimant can apply in respect of a counterclaim made against him where he is technically a defendant to that claim.

In the present economy, parties are more likely to consider security applications, which will become more significant in any litigation.

Partner Paul Gordon worked for a number of London firms and joined us from the City office of a top Scottish law firm. As a specialist litigator, Paul has acted for major clients including Kohler Mira, American Express, Morgan Stanley, GE Capital, and PizzaExpress. He has wide experience in financial services and banking disputes as well as shareholder and partnership matters, commercial supply, agency distribution and franchise contracts. He frequently acts in construction disputes and advises on intellectual property issues.

If you need clear and pragmatic legal advice, we’re here to help so please get in touch.

Contact us

Disclaimer: All legal information is correct at the time of publication but please be aware that laws may change over time. This article contains general legal information but should not be relied upon as legal advice. Please seek professional legal advice about your specific situation - contact us; we’d be delighted to help.
Resources to help

Related articles

Changes to company law – what businesses need to know


This week, initial changes to company law – including the biggest changes to Companies House since it began – will start to take effect. Here, our corporate and commercial team…

Chris Wills LLB (Hons)

Unearthing the implicit duty of cooperation in commercial contracts


In the world of business, contracts are the bedrock upon which deals are built. These carefully crafted documents are a testament to the mutual understanding between parties, outlining their respective…

Richard Holland BA (Hons)
Senior associate, solicitor

Why sole director companies should check articles of association


A recent case has highlighted the importance of ensuring a company is incorporated with carefully drafted articles of association, if there is only one director. All limited companies must have…

Helen Howes LLM
Associate, solicitor
Contact us