Back
Get in Touch Menu

Turning a blind eye: the concept of 'dishonest assistance'

20 September 2019

The court has shed light on the legal concept of ‘dishonest assistance’, in the recent case of Group Seven Limited & Others v Notable Services LLP & Others [2019].

By way of background, police had investigated an €88M fraud case, in which the money was returned. The Group Seven court case was dealing with issues to include the liability of an accountant, Mr Landman, who received a substantial payment in assisting others in the matter.

The court had to determine whether Mr Landman’s actions amounted to ‘dishonest assistance’.

The legal test for determining this is complicated. It includes an assessment of the actual state of the individual’s knowledge or belief on the facts. When this ‘state of mind’ has been established, the question whether their conduct was dishonest is to be determined by (objective) standards of ordinary decent people.

There is no requirement that the defendant (Mr Landman in this case) must have appreciated that what he had done was by those standards dishonest.

In the Group Seven case, the issue that the court considered was whether Mr Landman had ‘blind eye’ knowledge, even though he allegedly didn’t have actual knowledge of the facts.

In other words, despite his suspicions, did he consciously decide to refrain from trying to confirm the true state of affairs, out of fear of what he might discover?

In this case, when considering the issue of dishonest assistance, the court found that Mr Landman did indeed have ‘blind eye’ knowledge.

This case highlights, particularly for those involved in the administration of trusts, the importance of not ‘turning a blind eye’. If you’re concerned about any transactions, you should actively take reasonable steps to understand the true state of affairs.

As always, if you need pragmatic legal advice, we’re here to help so please get in touch.

Contact us

Disclaimer: All legal information is correct at the time of publication but please be aware that laws may change over time. This article contains general legal information but should not be relied upon as legal advice. Please seek professional legal advice about your specific situation - contact us; we’d be delighted to help.
Contact
Paul Gordon LLB
Partner
View profile
Related services
Share this article
Resources to help

Related articles

Misrepresentation claim: Horror case of buying a property with a moth infestation

Litigation & dispute resolution

Our property litigation specialists look into a recent misrepresentation claim, serving as a reminder that it never pays to falsify information when selling property. In the case of Patarkatsishvili and…

Bethen Abraham LLB (Hons), LLM
Solicitor

Key amendments to the Renters’ Rights Bill: August 2025

Litigation & dispute resolution

The Renters’ Rights Bill is now in its final stages and is expected to receive Royal Assent this year. Many anticipate it commencing from early 2026. Currently, the House of…

Bethen Abraham LLB (Hons), LLM
Solicitor

Can tenants claim for multiple breaches of tenancy deposit rules?

Property disputes

Residential landlords have a legal requirement to protect a tenant’s deposit. But if a landlord fails to do so more than once, can a tenant claim for multiple breaches of…

Bethen Abraham LLB (Hons), LLM
Solicitor
Contact us