Get in Touch Menu

An affordable forum for SMEs with IP disputes

05 December 2017

Intellectual property (IP) disputes in the High Court can be costly and complex, but did you know that there is a specialist court which may provide SMEs with a quicker and cheaper way to resolve them?

The Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (IPEC) is in the Chancery Division of the High Court. The IPEC is intended to provide a cost-effective forum to hear IP disputes, as an alternative to the claim proceeding through the High Court in the usual way.

A specialist IP judge will take an active role in case management and ensure that the extent of evidence is strictly controlled (e.g limiting disclosure, expert evidence, and even arguments made at trial).

There is a cap on the value of the claim (currently £0.5m), along with an overall cap on recoverable costs which is (a) £50,000 for proceedings to trial on the issue of liability and (b) £25,000 for an inquiry into damages.

There is a time limit too, a trial in the IPEC should ordinarily last no longer than 2 days.

Even if a claim is likely to be valued at more than £0.5m the case can proceed in the IPEC if both parties agree. However, due to the more streamlined approach and reduced costs the IPEC is mostly suitable for smaller, shorter, less complex cases with a value below the maximum limit.

One of the purposes of the IPEC is to make litigation more affordable to businesses who wish to protect their IP, and avoid the more expensive process of the usual High Court procedure. It is often suitable for SMEs and can be an effective means to enforce rights in the market place, and to avoid being out-gunned by larger opponents with deeper pockets.

In the case of 77M Ltd v Ordnance Survey Ltd and others [2017] (IPEC) the judge in the IPEC refused a request by one party to have the case transferred from the IPEC into the High Court, on the basis that to do so would remove the smaller party’s access to the courts, and that they would otherwise be unable to fund the case.

Paul Gordon is a partner in our litigation and dispute resolution department. He joined Willans from a City law firm in 2005, and has experience in handling a broad range of commercial matters, including intellectual property, director and shareholder disputes, and engineering and construction cases.

We're here to help
Disclaimer: All legal information is correct at the time of publication but please be aware that laws may change over time. This article contains general legal information but should not be relied upon as legal advice. Please seek professional legal advice about your specific situation - contact us; we’d be delighted to help.
Resources to help

Related articles

Section 8: What are the differences between mandatory grounds & discretionary grounds?

Litigation & dispute resolution

In a new series – ‘What does the law say?’ – our property litigation specialists discuss the key parts of residential possession law landlords and tenants should be aware of.…

Nick Southwell BA (Hons)

The King’s speech 2023: Changes to the property sector

Litigation & dispute resolution

In November 2023, HM King Charles delivered the King’s speech which set out the government’s planned legislative programme for the coming year. Our litigation specialists summarise the proposed bills that…

Simon Arneaud LLB (Hons)
Senior associate, solicitor

Can’t sell your property due to the ground rent? Is your service charge fee too high?

Litigation & dispute resolution

The Leasehold Reform (Ground Rent) Act 2022 came into force in June 2022 to ensure ground rent does not exceed one peppercorn per year. This only applies to new leases…

Nick Southwell BA (Hons)
Contact us