Courts can sometimes ‘interfere’ in cases where they feel that to apply strict legal rights would be unfair or unjust, explains one of commercial property lawyers.
Most people’s view about property deals is that they have to be set down in writing. While we would not dream of advising otherwise, a recent case shows that even without a written agreement, all may not be lost.
In Yeomans Row Management Ltd V Cobbe, a developer was awarded a half share of the increase in value of a property after planning permission was granted.
Yeomans owned a block of flats. The developer James Cobbe spent time and money obtaining planning permission to redevelop the property, relying on a verbal agreement that Yeomans would sell it to him once planning permission had been obtained.
This was the essence of what was agreed. At his own expense, Cobbe would apply for planning permission to demolish the flats and build six townhouses.
When consent was granted and vacant possession obtained, Yeomans would sell the property to Cobbe for £12m. When the development was completed, Cobbe would pay Yeomans an overage payment of 50% of any gross sale proceeds of the houses in excess of £24m. The longstop date by which planning consent was to be obtained was unclear. There were no formal heads of terms and no solicitors were instructed.
Obtaining planning consent cost Cobbe up to £200,000 and the day after it was granted, Yeomans contacted him, trying to renegotiate the price. They claimed that the verbal agreement had lapsed, as planning permission had not been obtained by the alleged longstop date.
Cobbe issued proceedings, claiming an interest in the property (or the proceeds of its sale). He argued that he should be granted relief reflecting the enhanced value of the property now that planning permission had been granted.
Yeomans denied there was any legally enforceable agreement and argued that Cobbe had undertaken the expenses at his own risk. They claimed the negotiations were ‘subject to contract’ and were never intended to be legally binding.
The High Court held that Cobbe had an equity by virtue of proprietary estoppel and was entitled to a lien on the property for half of the increase in its value due to the grant of the planning permission.
The courts applied a remedy known as ‘proprietary estoppel’, a means by which property rights may be affected or created. Simply put, it allows courts to interfere in cases where they feel that to apply strict legal rights would be unfair or unjust.
After a lengthy court battle, Cobbe won an award amounting to well over £5m. This may be considered generous since he had to neither risk any capital nor carry out any development. However, the Court of Appeal (who upheld the earlier High Court decision) decided that it was not disproportionate to the detriment he had suffered and considered that there was no other remedy that was fair and workable in the circumstances.
One of our lawyers commented: “Proprietary estoppel is a discretionary remedy available to the courts but it tends to be used rarely. The case is interesting in that it shows it is possible for courts to err on the side of generosity. However it is certainly not a cure-all: generally speaking claims are hard to prove and unless very substantial sums are at stake, the cost of pursuing a claim would be prohibitive. The case doesn’t cause us to change our advice that agreements should be properly documented.”
As always, if you need commercial and pragmatic legal advice, we’re here to help so please get in touch.
Disclaimer: All legal information is correct at the time of publication but please be aware that laws may change over time. This article contains general legal information but should not be relied upon as legal advice. Please seek professional legal advice about your specific situation - contact us; we’d be delighted to help.
We previously reported on the new Charities Act 2022. The first wave of provisions in relation to charity land are now in force, with more expected to be in force…
The discovery of failing reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete (RAAC) in schools just before the beginning of term certainly caught the attention of the public and the media. The problem of…
Our real estate experts explain more about how electronic signatures are now considered legally binding from a property perspective. In our real estate department, we now regularly use a platform…
Our website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through our website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorised as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyse and understand how you use our website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies but it may affect your browsing experience on our website. You can find our cookie policy here.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for our website to function and enable core functionality such as security and accessibility. These cookies do not store any personal information. You can block these cookies by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Cookie
Duration
Description
__cf_bm
30 minutes
This cookie, set by Cloudflare, is used to support Cloudflare Bot Management.
mgref
1 year
This cookie is set by Eventbrite to deliver content tailored to the end user's interests and improve content creation. It is also used for event-booking purposes.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Cookie
Duration
Description
_ga
2 years
The _ga cookie, installed by Google Analytics, calculates visitor, session and campaign data and also keeps track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookie stores information anonymously and assigns a randomly generated number to recognize unique visitors.
_gat
1 minute
This cookie is installed by Google Universal Analytics to restrain request rate and thus limit the collection of data on high traffic sites.
_gid
1 day
Installed by Google Analytics, _gid cookie stores information on how visitors use a website, while also creating an analytics report of the website's performance. Some of the data that are collected include the number of visitors, their source, and the pages they visit anonymously.
G
1 year
Cookie used to facilitate the translation into the preferred language of the visitor.
vuid
2 years
Vimeo installs this cookie to collect tracking information by setting a unique ID to embed videos to the website.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.