Back
Get in Touch Menu

New debt recovery protocol 2017: what do you need to know?

05 October 2017

On 1 October, a new debt recovery protocol came into place which should be complied with before proceedings are issued by a creditor.

It is designed to reduce the amount of claims put before the court. It applies to businesses (including sole traders and public bodies) attempting to recover debt where the debtor is an individual (including sole traders). It does not cover business-to-business debts.

The introduction of the new protocol is controversial because creditors, used to sending a 7-day letter of claim followed by court action, will no longer be able to proceed on that basis. Debtors will be able to use the protocol to delay having to make payment.

The key changes concern the letter of claim, which should now include the following:

  • An up-to-date account statement for the debt, including interest and charges
  • details of the agreement under which the debt arises
  • if regular instalments have been offered by the debtor but refused by the creditor, the reasons why this is not acceptable
  • details as to how the debt can be paid and what the customer can do if they want to discuss payment options
  • an information sheet and reply form.

Most notable perhaps is the fact that the new protocol has significantly increased the time before a creditor can issue court proceedings. In particular, debtors are given 30 days to respond to the letter of claim, and a further 30 days to complete the reply form.

If no agreement can be reached about the existence, enforceability, amount or any other aspect of the debt, they should consider using an appropriate form of alternative dispute resolution to try and resolve the dispute. If this is unsuccessful the creditor should give the customer at least 14 days’ notice of its intention to commence court action.

In cases where the creditor believes recovery of the debt to be urgent, they would need to consider the risks of non-compliance with the protocol. The court could stay proceedings whilst the protocol is complied with, or make a costs order against the creditor.

Megan is a paralegal in our litigation and dispute resolution team. She deals with debt recovery and enforcement, property and landlord and tenant matters, civil litigation and disputes arising from commercial contracts.

We're here to help
Disclaimer: All legal information is correct at the time of publication but please be aware that laws may change over time. This article contains general legal information but should not be relied upon as legal advice. Please seek professional legal advice about your specific situation - contact us; we’d be delighted to help.
Contact
Megan Bullingham BA (Hons), FCILEx
Associate, chartered legal executive
View profile
Megan Bullingham
Related services
Share this article
Resources to help

Related articles

Updates to the Renters’ Rights Bill: what do they mean for tenants and landlords?

Litigation & dispute resolution

The Renters’ Rights Bill is in the committee stage in the House of Lords and predicted to be enacted this year. As it nears approval, several key updates to the…

Bethen Abraham LLB (Hons), LLM
Solicitor

Unfair prejudice petitions: Recent shareholder dispute case overturns 40-year precedent

Litigation & dispute resolution

In a recent shareholder dispute, it’s been found that unfair prejudice petitions are subject to statutory limitation periods. This landmark judgment – in Thg Plc v Zedra Trust Company (Jersey)…

Katie Charlton LLB (Hons), MSc
Trainee solicitor

Wagatha Christie defamation trial

Litigation & dispute resolution

The facts surrounding the “Wagatha Christie” defamation trial have been widely publicised, particularly following Coleen Rooney’s recent appearance on popular reality TV show “I’m a celebrity… Get me out of…

Bethen Abraham LLB (Hons), LLM
Solicitor
Contact us