Back
We continue to provide our legal services through the COVID-19 lockdown. Please visit our COVID-19 Hub for legal insights, or contact us directly.
Get in Touch Menu

New debt recovery protocol 2017: what do you need to know?

05 October 2017

On 1 October, a new debt recovery protocol came into place which should be complied with before proceedings are issued by a creditor.

It is designed to reduce the amount of claims put before the court. It applies to businesses (including sole traders and public bodies) attempting to recover debt where the debtor is an individual (including sole traders). It does not cover business-to-business debts.

The introduction of the new protocol is controversial because creditors, used to sending a 7-day letter of claim followed by court action, will no longer be able to proceed on that basis. Debtors will be able to use the protocol to delay having to make payment.

The key changes concern the letter of claim, which should now include the following:

  • An up-to-date account statement for the debt, including interest and charges
  • details of the agreement under which the debt arises
  • if regular instalments have been offered by the debtor but refused by the creditor, the reasons why this is not acceptable
  • details as to how the debt can be paid and what the customer can do if they want to discuss payment options
  • an information sheet and reply form.

Most notable perhaps is the fact that the new protocol has significantly increased the time before a creditor can issue court proceedings. In particular, debtors are given 30 days to respond to the letter of claim, and a further 30 days to complete the reply form.

If no agreement can be reached about the existence, enforceability, amount or any other aspect of the debt, they should consider using an appropriate form of alternative dispute resolution to try and resolve the dispute. If this is unsuccessful the creditor should give the customer at least 14 days’ notice of its intention to commence court action.

In cases where the creditor believes recovery of the debt to be urgent, they would need to consider the risks of non-compliance with the protocol. The court could stay proceedings whilst the protocol is complied with, or make a costs order against the creditor.

Megan is a paralegal in our litigation and dispute resolution team. She deals with debt recovery and enforcement, property and landlord and tenant matters, civil litigation and disputes arising from commercial contracts.

We're here to help
Contact
Megan Bullingham BA (Hons), ACILEx
Litigation executive
View profile
Megan Bullingham
Related services
Share this article
Resources to help

Related articles

The classic car market & the law - Q&A

Classic car disputes

The classic car market is a multi-billion pound industry, not surprisingly with many legal complications, but that shouldn’t impair the joy these four-wheeled icons can bring… What kind of businesses…

Paul Gordon LLB
Partner

Turning a blind eye: the concept of 'dishonest assistance'

Litigation & dispute resolution

The court has shed light on the legal concept of ‘dishonest assistance’, in the recent case of Group Seven Limited & Others v Notable Services LLP & Others [2019]. By…

Paul Gordon LLB
Partner

Legal brain Q&A: A guide to intellectual property rights

Intellectual property disputes

They say that imitation is the highest form of flattery. But when it comes to intellectual property, a competitor copying your ideas can put your business’s whole operation and finances at…

Paul Gordon LLB
Partner
Contact us