Back
Get in Touch Menu

Marketing calls – fines imposed

21 April 2015

A first tier tribunal has upheld a monetary penalty notice for £50,000 for failure to comply with the rules on unsolicited direct marketing calls, as set out in Regulation 21 of the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations 2003 (as amended).

A company selling UPVC windows and related products to the domestic market made nearly 4 million telephone calls between May 2011 and April 2013 of which some 80% to 90% were direct marketing calls. The Information Commissioner relied on 524 unsolicited marketing calls, many of which had been made to individuals who had registered their telephone number with the Telephone Preference Service.

This case serves as a useful reminder to businesses that they are legally obliged to check the Telephone Preference Service before calling individuals, without their consent, for direct marketing purposes. Organisations need to keep up-to-date and accurate records, evidence of staff training and compliance in relation to direct marketing.

Disclaimer: All legal information is correct at the time of publication but please be aware that laws may change over time. This article contains general legal information but should not be relied upon as legal advice. Please seek professional legal advice about your specific situation - contact us; we’d be delighted to help.
Contact
Willans
Solicitors
About
Share this article
Resources to help

Related articles

Outsourced staff & liability: What businesses need to know

Employment & business immigration

What do businesses need to know when it comes to outsourced staff and liability? Our team of employment law experts takes a look at a recent case that could provide…

Hifsa O'Kelly LLB (Hons)
Partner

Whistleblowing disputes: Key lessons for employers & boards

Employment & business immigration

Our expert employment law team looks into a recent case that highlights key whistleblowing lessons for employers and those at board level. McLean v Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust…

Hifsa O'Kelly LLB (Hons)
Partner

Intimidating union group chat messages: Fair or unfair dismissal?

Employment & business immigration

Are union group chat messages protected Trade Union activities? Or was this employee fairly dismissed for comments he shared on WhatsApp? Our team looks at a recent case that provides…

Achante Anson LLB (Hons)
Trainee solicitor
Contact us