Legal ‘discretion’ may help defaulting buyers reclaim deposit
27 June 2008
In a difficult market it is inevitable that more land sales will fall through, some even after contracts have been exchanged and deposits paid.
It is a standard requirement in land transactions that a buyer pays a deposit on exchange of contracts. He gets the deposit back if the seller fails to complete, but forfeits it if he is the one to drop out.
That is, at least, the expectation in standard practice but in fact the court has discretion to order the deposit to be returned if it thinks fit. This little-know discretion (contained in the Law of Property Act 1925) is an attractive idea for defaulting buyers, particularly if the deposit is substantial. But as recent case law shows, there must be very persuasive reasons as to why the deposit should not be forfeited.
The starting point for the court is that repayment should only be ordered if it is the fairest course in all the circumstances. The consequences of paying a deposit should be certain, and buyers should expect to forfeit if they fail to complete. They should not be able to reclaim the deposit merely because the sale does not go through.
The court will look at how close the buyer came to performing the contract, what other choices he is able to offer the seller and how they would compare with the actual performance of the original contract terms. If the seller can re-sell at a higher price, the return of the deposit might be justified, but in itself this is not a sufficient ground. Equally, the conduct of the respective parties may be considered. This does not necessarily prevent the seller, however, from playing hard ball and refusing to negotiate with the buyer outside the terms of the original contract.
Buyers should make sure they definitely want (and can) go ahead with the transaction before exchanging contracts and paying the deposit.
As always, if you need commercial and pragmatic legal advice, we’re here to help so please get in touch.
Commercial property solicitor Emma Thompson answers some key pandemic-related questions for landlords and tenants in the commercial sphere. I am a tenant, do I have to pay my rent? If…
From 1 September 2020, the categories under the Town and Country Planning (Use Classes Order) 1987 are changing to create two new use classes. It is hoped that the overhaul…
As you will be aware from some of our previous updates, a number of measures have been put in place to give businesses the breathing space and tools they need…
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through our website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorised as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyse and understand how you use our website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies but it may affect your browsing experience on our website. You can find our cookie policy here.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for our website to function and enable core functionality such as security and accessibility. These cookies do not store any personal information. You can block these cookies by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.
We use performance cookies such as Google Analytics to help us count the number of visitors and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works, for example, by ensuring that users are finding what they are looking for easily. The cookies collect information in a way that does not directly identify anyone. For more information on how these cookies work, please see our cookie policy.