Back
Get in Touch Menu

Just Eat in the spotlight after delivery driver uses customer data to send inappropriate texts

19 January 2018

Just Eat are under the spotlight for a delivery driver using customer data to send inappropriate texts to a female customer. It is possible that the driver’s use of a customer’s personal data in this way will be determined to be a breach of the Data Protection Act.

To hear further comment on this story tune into BBC Radio Gloucestershire to listen to our head of employment law, Matthew Clayton’s interview. Click here to be taken to BBC Radio Glos iPlayer (listen in from 2:08:13). 

The issue of whether an employer can be held to be vicariously liable for an employee breaching data protection legislation was recently considered in Various Claimants v WM Morrisons Supermarkets PLC. The High Court was asked to determine if Morrisons was liable for a senior manager disclosing the personal information of around 100,000 colleagues online. (He also sent the information to three newspapers).

For an employer to be held liable for an act of its employee, there must be a sufficient connection between the employee’s employment and the wrongful conduct. Very often the court will look at factors such as whether the wrongful conduct occurred in the course of the employee’s employment. In the Morrisons case, the High Court held that it was liable for the act of the senior manager because it occurred in the normal course of his employment – this was despite his act being carried out on his own computer and outside of working hours. The court also held that Morrisons had itself breached the Data Protection Act by failing to organise the deletion of the data from the manager’s computer. (Morrisons have been granted the right to appeal this decision).

Whether Just Eat will be subject to further action following the driver using its customer’s details in this way, is at the time of writing unknown, but at the very least it is likely to warrant further investigation both by Just Eat internally and by the Information Commissioner.

Matthew heads our employment team. Matthew trained and worked at a City of London law firm. He handles the full range of employment law issues with specialisms in complex staff restructurings and employment issues concerning business transfers. Matthew is recommended by independent legal directory Chambers and Partners which describes him as ‘solutions-focused’ and ‘a solid and respected practitioner noted for his technical abilities’.  

We're here to help

Disclaimer: All legal information is correct at the time of publication but please be aware that laws may change over time. This article contains general legal information but should not be relied upon as legal advice. Please seek professional legal advice about your specific situation - contact us; we’d be delighted to help.
Resources to help

Related articles

Employment status – the importance of getting it right

Employment & business immigration

When an individual provides services to a business, it is important for all concerned to understand the nature of that relationship. The individual could be one of three things: an…

Simon Pathé FCILEx
Partner, chartered legal executive

Equal pay claim: Thandi and others v Next Retail Limited

Employment & business immigration

Over 3,500 predominantly female retail consultants employed by Next Retail Limited (Next) collectively brought an equal pay claim against their employer. The claim was on the basis that the work…

Hifsa O'Kelly LLB (Hons)
Senior associate, solicitor

Fertility treatment & the workplace: Understanding employee rights

Employment & business immigration

In recent years, there has been a significant increase in individuals seeking fertility treatment. This trend includes not only heterosexual couples but also same-sex couples, single mothers, and those opting…

Klára Grmelová MGR (LLM Czech)
Solicitor
Contact us