Get in Touch Menu

Employer was vicariously liable for theft by employee

29 March 2011

Where does an employer stand when an employee has done something illegal or even criminal in the course of his work? Willans reports on the most recent example, where the appeal court ruled that the employer was vicariously liable for an act of theft carried out by a member of staff.

The case, Brink’s Global Services Inc & others v Igrox Ltd, concerned an employee who stole a number of silver bars from a shipping container that he was supposed to be fumigating. 

The law has changed a great deal in recent years and the courts have not always produced consistent views. The dominant principle is that there must be a sufficiently close connection between the employee’s wrongful act and the work he is employed to do. In this case, the fact that the man stole from the container he was required to clean as part of his job satisfied the court that there was such a connection.

The concept of vicarious liability can apply in a wide variety of work and employment situations. For example, in a case that went to appeal last year, the Birmingham Archdiocese of the Roman Catholic Church was held vicariously liable for sexual abuse carried out by a priest whose acts were possible only because of his status and his responsibility for youth work.

If your staff carry out services for your clients, or are responsible for holding clients’ property, it is worth bearing in mind the need to protect those clients from potential wrongdoing by your own employees. You might also consider your insurance provision in that context.

If you need clear and pragmatic legal advice, we’re here to help so please get in touch.

Contact us



Disclaimer: All legal information is correct at the time of publication but please be aware that laws may change over time. This article contains general legal information but should not be relied upon as legal advice. Please seek professional legal advice about your specific situation - contact us; we’d be delighted to help.
Nick Cox LLB (Hons)
Consultant, solicitor
View profile
Nick Cox
Related services
Share this article
Resources to help

Related articles

Section 8: What are the differences between mandatory grounds & discretionary grounds?

Litigation & dispute resolution

In a new series – ‘What does the law say?’ – our property litigation specialists discuss the key parts of residential possession law landlords and tenants should be aware of.…

Nick Southwell BA (Hons)

The King’s speech 2023: Changes to the property sector

Litigation & dispute resolution

In November 2023, HM King Charles delivered the King’s speech which set out the government’s planned legislative programme for the coming year. Our litigation specialists summarise the proposed bills that…

Simon Arneaud LLB (Hons)
Senior associate, solicitor

Can’t sell your property due to the ground rent? Is your service charge fee too high?

Litigation & dispute resolution

The Leasehold Reform (Ground Rent) Act 2022 came into force in June 2022 to ensure ground rent does not exceed one peppercorn per year. This only applies to new leases…

Nick Southwell BA (Hons)
Contact us