Careful lotting of farmland is required to save SDLT
08 April 2015
The Autumn Statement in December saw wholesale revisions of the Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) system.
The changes will bring major savings on residential transactions below £937,500 but anything above that figure could result in a higher SDLT bill.
What effect may this have on farmers?
The existing 4% SDLT rate has remained unchanged for “non-residential and mixed use properties” – the category which covers most working farms. Care must be taken when selling large agricultural holdings that include residential properties. At a price of £1 million, the difference in SDLT using the new residential system and the 4% mixed use rate is only £3,750. Perhaps not enough to concern a buyer but where properties are of a substantial size and likely to attract prices in excess of £2 million the amount of SDLT payable becomes important.
The point is illustrated by the wide difference in tax – at £153,750 the amount of SDLT payable on a residential £2 million property is almost double the £80,000 fixed rate 4% payable on a £2 million residential property which qualifies as a “mixed use property”. When the residential element is worth £5 million the saving is even more eye watering with the sliding scale SDLT difference rising to £240,000.
The increase in SDLT, if you lose the protection of the “mixed use property” banner, means that over-lotting an estate or farm may remove it from the protection which is a benefit of dealing with rural property.
It is very important that sellers consider the financial burden of buyers when deciding their sale strategy. Careful discussions with those involved before sale particulars are prepared are now more important than ever.
We are delighted to welcome senior associate Adam Hale to our agriculture & estates team this month. Adam, a specialist in agricultural law, estate planning and estate administration, joins the…
For prescriptive rights to arise over land, they have to have been exercised without force, secrecy or permission of the landowner. Winterburn v Bennet In the case of Winterburn v Bennett, the…
The High Court decision in Lancashire County Council v The Secretary of State for Environment is a salutary warning to landowners of the risks of not taking steps to prevent…
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through our website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorised as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyse and understand how you use our website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies but it may affect your browsing experience on our website. You can find our cookie policy here.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for our website to function and enable core functionality such as security and accessibility. These cookies do not store any personal information. You can block these cookies by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.
We use performance cookies such as Google Analytics to help us count the number of visitors and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works, for example, by ensuring that users are finding what they are looking for easily. The cookies collect information in a way that does not directly identify anyone. For more information on how these cookies work, please see our cookie policy.