Back
We continue to provide our legal services through the COVID-19 lockdown. Please visit our COVID-19 Hub for legal insights, or contact us directly.
Get in Touch Menu

A warning on settlement negotiations

30 March 2012

The recent case Thameside Construction Company Ltd v Arthenella Ltd is a reminder of the lawyer’s mantra to tread carefully in direct discussions with the other side, particularly if these involve potential settlement negotiations.

Thameside was appointed by Arthenella to carry out works to a listed Victorian manor house. There was a disagreement over the sum due to Thameside and each side began legal proceedings.

After unsuccessful written offers made via both sides’ solicitors, the MDs of the two companies decided to speak on the phone to try to reach agreement. After this call, Thameside said a settlement had been reached but Arthenella denied it. After hearing evidence from both MDs, the judge found that agreement had indeed been reached, whereby Arthenella was to pay Thameside £275,000 in full and final settlement.

Disputing parties will often try to resolve matters between themselves without legal advisors present. In principle there is nothing wrong with this – they may feel they can speak more freely without lawyers and it can be useful in identifying areas of common ground. On the other hand, it can be risky to settle a case there and then, without time to reflect on what was discussed and the impact it may have on your position.

As a precaution, it is sensible to make it clear beforehand that the settlement negotiations are ‘subject to contract’ and will take binding effect only on entering into a written settlement agreement. This allows time for parties to seek legal advice if necessary and take steps to ensure the deal is certain, and what was intended.

As always, if you need commercial and pragmatic legal advice, we’re here to help so please get in touch.

Contact us

Contact
Nick Southwell LLB (Hons)
Associate, solicitor
View profile
Related services
Share this article
Resources to help

Related articles

The classic car market & the law - Q&A

Classic car disputes

The classic car market is a multi-billion pound industry, not surprisingly with many legal complications, but that shouldn’t impair the joy these four-wheeled icons can bring… What kind of businesses…

Paul Gordon LLB
Partner

Turning a blind eye: the concept of 'dishonest assistance'

Litigation & dispute resolution

The court has shed light on the legal concept of ‘dishonest assistance’, in the recent case of Group Seven Limited & Others v Notable Services LLP & Others [2019]. By…

Paul Gordon LLB
Partner

Legal brain Q&A: A guide to intellectual property rights

Intellectual property disputes

They say that imitation is the highest form of flattery. But when it comes to intellectual property, a competitor copying your ideas can put your business’s whole operation and finances at…

Paul Gordon LLB
Partner
Contact us