Back
Get in Touch Menu

What is a ‘reasonable’ adjustment?

08 July 2010

The Disability Discrimination Act is a difficult piece of legislation for employers. It imposes a duty on them to make ‘reasonable’ adjustments to premises or working practices so as to allow disabled employees to stay in work. Willans reports on a recent ruling in which the EAT placed some practical and sensible limits on what is considered reasonable.

The Case

  • The claimant in the case, Mrs Wilson, worked as an administrator on a scheme run by Job Centre Plus. She suffered from agoraphobia and panic attacks and so had been given a role that involved minimal contact with the public. Her condition made it difficult for her to leave home on her own but the office was only some 100 yards away so she was able to manage the journey.
  • When the scheme came to an end and the office was closed in 2006, Mrs Wilson asked to work from home. After due investigation, the employer decided it was not a feasible option for someone working at her level. They explored a range of possibilities, such as Mrs Wilson being accompanied to and from work by a colleague, paying for taxis and engaging a support worker for her. She refused, saying that home working was the only way in which she would be able to work.
  • Some two years later, she was dismissed for capability due to her disability-related sickness absence. Her disability discrimination claim succeeded in the first employment tribunal.
  • However at appeal, the EAT said that the adjustments proposed by the employer were reasonable in the circumstances. Even had they agreed to home-working, it would not have resolved Mrs Wilson’s disadvantage because the work could not be effectively done from home. It was also impracticable because her job involved direct customer contact with confidential public information. They were, therefore, right to consider home-working to be an unreasonable adjustment.

Comments

In such situations, the correct approach for the employer is a careful consideration of exactly what it is the employee complains of and exactly how that difficulty can be alleviated. Will the adjustment overcome the disadvantage faced by that worker? If it would, then to what extent is it practicable for the employer to make the adjustment the worker has requested.

What is clear is that it is not a matter of the disabled employee picking and choosing what adjustments they would like, but rather whether those adjustments are indeed appropriate and effective and whether it is practicable for the employer to carry them out.

 

If you need clear and pragmatic legal advice, we’re here to help so please get in touch.

Contact us

Disclaimer: All legal information is correct at the time of publication but please be aware that laws may change over time. This article contains general legal information but should not be relied upon as legal advice. Please seek professional legal advice about your specific situation - contact us; we’d be delighted to help.
Resources to help

Related articles

New data protection complaints procedure requirements

GDPR & data protection

From 1 June 2026, under the UK’s Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 (DUAA), organisations will be legally required to have a publicly accessible process for handling data protection complaints…

Frazer Wallace BSc (Hons), Graduate Diploma in Law (GDL)
Associate, solicitor

Is incorporating a charity right for my organisation?

Real estate

The legal form a charity adopts shapes how it is regulated, the extent of trustee liability, and how effectively it can hold assets, enter contracts and deliver its charitable purposes.…

Charlotte Cowdell BA (Hons), LLB
Partner

Pioneering tattoo charity MTA shares client experience

Corporate

After launching Paradise Tattoo Studio from a small, single room in Cheltenham, tattoo artist Tanya Buxton was keen to explore how tattooing could help and empower people, both physically and…

Willans
Solicitors
Contact us