Get in Touch Menu

The uncertainty of ‘reasonableness’

21 March 2012

‘Reasonableness’ is one of the most commonly-used words in English law yet the concept is hard to define and usually depends on the facts of the case.

But in the event of a dispute, over-reliance on the use of ‘reasonableness’ in an agreement can leave you open to a judge’s interpretation of what is, or isn’t, ‘reasonable’, as happened in this recent case.

Porton Capital Technology Funds sold a company (Acolyte) to 3M under an agreement containing an earn-out mechanism – a device whereby all, or part of, the purchase price is determined by the future performance of the company. The amount payable under the earn-out was 100 per cent of net sales for 2009 up to £41m.

3M agreed to promote Acolyte’s main pharmaceutical product and not cease the business without Proton’s written consent which, crucially, was not to be ‘unreasonably withheld’. In the event, the product performed badly, 3M ceased promoting it, and offered Proton US$1m for their consent to discontinue the business. Porton refused and claimed the maximum earn-out sum of £41m. Was their refusal reasonable?

The High Court ruled that Porton had acted reasonably in refusing consent to cease the business. Key factors in their decision were: the earn-out payments constituted the main sum owed by 3M; previous estimates were considerably higher and Porton reasonably believed that net sales would exceed US$1m; Porton did not have to take 3M’s explanations at face value; and since Porton were not involved in running Acolyte, they had limited knowledge of how it was being run.

As this example shows, commercial agreements should be drafted with precision, addressing all eventualities rather than relying on uncertain concepts such as ‘reasonableness’ to determine important issues. Having a clear-cut understanding in place at the start of a commercial relationship can prevent a shed-load of ambiguity, hassle and legal cost further down the line.

As always, if you need commercial and pragmatic legal advice, we’re here to help so please get in touch.

Contact us

Disclaimer: All legal information is correct at the time of publication but please be aware that laws may change over time. This article contains general legal information but should not be relied upon as legal advice. Please seek professional legal advice about your specific situation - contact us; we’d be delighted to help.
Nick Cox LLB (Hons)
Consultant, solicitor
View profile
Nick Cox
Related services
Share this article
Resources to help

Related articles

Section 8: What are the differences between mandatory grounds & discretionary grounds?

Litigation & dispute resolution

In a new series – ‘What does the law say?’ – our property litigation specialists discuss the key parts of residential possession law landlords and tenants should be aware of.…

Nick Southwell BA (Hons)

The King’s speech 2023: Changes to the property sector

Litigation & dispute resolution

In November 2023, HM King Charles delivered the King’s speech which set out the government’s planned legislative programme for the coming year. Our litigation specialists summarise the proposed bills that…

Simon Arneaud LLB (Hons)
Senior associate, solicitor

Can’t sell your property due to the ground rent? Is your service charge fee too high?

Litigation & dispute resolution

The Leasehold Reform (Ground Rent) Act 2022 came into force in June 2022 to ensure ground rent does not exceed one peppercorn per year. This only applies to new leases…

Nick Southwell BA (Hons)
Contact us