We continue to provide our legal services through the COVID-19 pandemic. Please visit our COVID-19 Hub for legal insights, or contact us directly.
Get in Touch Menu

The Dilnot report: care funding

19 July 2011

In July, the distinguished economist Andrew Dilnot published his report into the best way to fund care for people in old age. Willans’ Wills, Trusts and Probate team looks at the financial implications of nursing home costs and what that might mean in terms of arranging your affairs for the longer-term.



At the moment, a council will only fully fund care home places for those who are means-tested as having under £23,250 of capital assets. Dilnot recommends:

• that a person’s lifetime contributions towards his or her social care costs (currently potentially unlimited) should be capped at £35,000, after which they would be eligible for full state support

• that the means-tested threshold, above which people are liable for their full care costs, should rise from £23,250 to £100,000.

Even assuming the report’s recommendations are implemented, nothing will change on this front for several years. For now it will remain necessary to consider the effect of nursing home costs when looking ahead.

Act early

As with tax planning, there are ways to arrange one’s affairs more efficiently to try and protect one’s estate but it is vital to act early. You must act well in advance of needing care and be fit and healthy – a rule of thumb is that you should act by your sixties at  the latest.

The reason for this is the so-called ‘intentional deprivation of capital’ rule that makes up part of the Charging for Residential Accommodation Guide (or CRAG). CRAG governs the way local authorities are supposed to charge for care.

This rule can let a council treat an asset a care home resident has given away as still belonging to the resident, even if the gift was made years earlier.

It is unreasonable for a council to try to prove intentional deprivation if the resident dealt with his or her assets at a time when care was not foreseeable. However it seems likely that councils may be forced in future to interpret CRAG less generously.

Other options

Putting one’s house in trust might offer some advantages but it also has drawbacks and legal input here is essential.

It is sometimes forgotten that it is only the assets of the resident in care which are assessed. There can, therefore, be considerable benefit in the ownership of jointly-held assets being separated out. Again, particularly in relation to land, legal input can prove useful.


If you need clear and pragmatic legal advice, we’re here to help so please get in touch.

Contact us

Simon Cook LLB (Hons), TEP
View profile
Simon Cook
Related services
Share this article
Resources to help

Related articles

Payback time: New OTS report could spark higher CGT liabilities for taxpayers

Wills, trusts & probate

What can be said about 2020? Terms such as pandemic, lockdown, social distancing and furlough became commonplace. We’ve all had to drastically change the way we live and work this…

Simon Cook LLB (Hons), TEP

Wills Act changes allow video witnessing : a much-needed update, or risky business?

Wills, trusts & probate

Changes to the Wills Act are set to allow video witnessing of wills in some circumstances. But while bringing the law up-to-date with today’s lifestyle is no bad thing, hastily-made…

Simon Cook LLB (Hons), TEP

Non-resident capital gains tax: what you need to know

Wills, trusts & probate

If you own property in the UK but do not live in the UK, you should make sure that you comply with non-resident capital gains tax (NRCGT) rules, including the…

Hannah Wall BA (Hons), MA
Senior associate, solicitor
Contact us