Back
We continue to provide our legal services through the COVID-19 lockdown. Please visit our COVID-19 Hub for legal insights, or contact us directly.
Get in Touch Menu

Share purchase agreements – when is a warranty a representation?

06 December 2016

When buying or selling company shares, the share purchase agreement (SPA) will contain extensive warranties and representations about the company which the seller will make to the buyer. A breach of a warranty or representation can have serious consequences so they should be considered carefully.

Contractual promises

A warranty is a promise which is made in a contract by one party to another, while a representation is a statement of fact made by one person to another which induces the other to enter into a contract.

This distinction is important because damages for a breach of warranty and damages for misrepresentation are calculated differently – generally speaking, a claim for misrepresentation will be more favourable to a buyer of shares than a claim for breach of warranty.

Warranties by their nature are also statements of fact, eg “there are no litigation claims in the company”.

Can a breach of warranty also be a misrepresentation?

In the case, Idemitsu Kosan Co. Ltd v Sumitomo Corporation, a buyer of shares discovered that one of the warranties was untrue and tried to claim that the warranty was a representation as they were time-barred from bringing a warranty claim under the SPA.

The court held that a warranty contained in a share purchase agreement does not automatically amount to a representation by its mere insertion in the SPA. In order for a warranty to be a representation, it is important that the representation is communicated before the contract is signed.

What is clear from the decision is that it is likely to be difficult to bring a successful claim that a breach of a warranty in the SPA is also a misrepresentation, if the SPA does not expressly include a provision that the warranties are also to take effect as representations.

Entire agreement clause

A seller of shares should therefore not agree to such a provision and, furthermore, should ensure that the SPA includes a comprehensive ‘entire agreement’ clause so as to exclude any claim for misrepresentation, whether arising from pre-contractual statements or from the warranties.

We're here to help

Contact
Sophie Martyn BSc (Hons)
Associate, solicitor
View profile
Sophie Martyn
Related services
Share this article
Resources to help

Related articles

Can a furloughed director fulfil their statutory duties?

Corporate

The government guidance on the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (the “scheme”) confirms that a director who is paid via PAYE can be furloughed. That same guidance also states that the…

Helen Howes LLM
Trainee solicitor

COVID-19 and filing obligations - the latest from Companies House

Corporate

The current situation of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic makes it difficult for companies to remain compliant with their filing obligations. In this article, we explain some of the key changes…

Helen Howes LLM
Trainee solicitor

Corporate transactions: Getting back to business

Corporate

The current coronavirus lockdown has inevitably resulted in numerous transactions and commercial initiatives being put on hold or, worse, aborted. This includes company and business acquisitions and sales and commercial…

Paul Symes-Thompson MA (Cantab)
Partner
Contact us