Back
Get in Touch Menu

Retirement and the DRA

09 November 2010

Few will have been able to avoid the news that the default retirement age (DRA) is to be scrapped. Currently the plans are only proposals and subject to consultation but the courts in the Heyday case (see Law News Winter 2008) made it clear that the current regime cannot remain.

Under the proposals the DRA will be removed on 1 October 2011. As employers must give at least six months’ notice of retirement, it would seem that the last date a retirement notice can be given is 31 March 2011. After 1 October 2011 retirement will be allowed only if it is objectively justified. The recent Court of Appeal case of Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes is helpful. The DRA applies to employees, not partners in a business. Mr Seldon, a partner in Clarkson Wright and Jakes solicitors, was compulsorily retired when he reached the age of 65. He brought a claim of age discrimination.

Clarkson Wright and Jakes argued that the use of a retirement age of 65 was aimed at giving senior solicitors the opportunity of partnership and to help with partnership and workforce planning. The Court of Appeal held that a retirement age of 65 was a proportionate means of achieving this aim. However, as with many things in law, it was not quite so straightforward. The court took into consideration the fact that the law currently allows employers to retire employees at 65 and decided that this supported 65 “as a fair and proportionate cut-off point”. The abolition of the DRA would remove this cut-off point.

Until the outcome of the consultation is published it is not known what, if anything, will replace the current regime. If nothing is put in its place, employers will need to rely on one of the reasons in the Employment Rights Act, for example capability or conduct, when looking to dismiss an older employee.

If you need clear and pragmatic legal advice, we’re here to help so please get in touch.

Contact us

Disclaimer: All legal information is correct at the time of publication but please be aware that laws may change over time. This article contains general legal information but should not be relied upon as legal advice. Please seek professional legal advice about your specific situation - contact us; we’d be delighted to help.
Contact
Nick Cox LLB (Hons)
Consultant, solicitor
View profile
Nick Cox
Related services
Share this article
Resources to help

Related articles

Employment status – the importance of getting it right

Employment & business immigration

When an individual provides services to a business, it is important for all concerned to understand the nature of that relationship. The individual could be one of three things: an…

Simon Pathé FCILEx
Partner, chartered legal executive

Equal pay claim: Thandi and others v Next Retail Limited

Employment & business immigration

Over 3,500 predominantly female retail consultants employed by Next Retail Limited (Next) collectively brought an equal pay claim against their employer. The claim was on the basis that the work…

Hifsa O'Kelly LLB (Hons)
Senior associate, solicitor

Fertility treatment & the workplace: Understanding employee rights

Employment & business immigration

In recent years, there has been a significant increase in individuals seeking fertility treatment. This trend includes not only heterosexual couples but also same-sex couples, single mothers, and those opting…

Klára Grmelová MGR (LLM Czech)
Solicitor
Contact us