Back
Get in Touch Menu

Residential tenancies - is a section 21 notice effective if served before the deposit is protected?

05 August 2014

The outcome of a recent County Court case means it may now be possible to rely on a section 21 notice to end a tenancy agreement provided the tenant’s deposit is lodged in the correct procedure.

Under current legislation (since 6 April 2007), a landlord must join a tenancy deposit scheme (‘TDS’) if a tenant under a residential assured shorthold tenancy (‘AST’) pays a deposit. The landlord is required to protect the deposit and provide the tenant with information about the TDS within 30 days of receiving it. If the landlord fails to comply, he cannot serve a notice under section 21 of the Housing Act 1988 unless the deposit is returned to the tenant in full (or in part by mutual agreement).

However, a recent case may have changed this position.On 18 December 2012, the tenant took an AST for an initial fixed term of six months commencing 20 December 2012. The tenant was to pay a deposit and the landlord was to register this with a TDS, within 14 days of receipt.

On 18 December 2012, the landlord served a section 21 notice on the tenant notifying him that she required possession at the end of the fixed term. On 2 January 2013, the tenant received a certificate stating that the deposit reached the landlord on 22 December 2012, and was protected from 2 January 2013. In June 2013, the landlord started possession proceedings and the tenant argued that the landlord could not rely on the section 21 notice because it had been served at a time when the deposit was not held in accordance with a TDS. The district judge dismissed the tenant’s argument and refused permission to appeal.

The tenant sought judicial review of the County Court’s decision to refuse the right to appeal. The High Court denied the request and commented that as the landlord had complied with the requirements of the Housing Act within 30 days, the section 21 notice was effective even though it was served before the deposit was protected by the TDS.

Therefore, if this decision is applied in future, it will be possible to rely on a section 21 notice served at a time when the deposit is not held in accordance with a TDS, provided that the landlord places the deposit in a TDS within 30 days of receipt.

We're here to help
Disclaimer: All legal information is correct at the time of publication but please be aware that laws may change over time. This article contains general legal information but should not be relied upon as legal advice. Please seek professional legal advice about your specific situation - contact us; we’d be delighted to help.
Contact
Nick Cox LLB (Hons)
Consultant, solicitor
View profile
Nick Cox
Related services
Share this article
Resources to help

Related articles

Property misrepresentation disputes - a complete guide

Property disputes

Our experienced solicitors help homeowners to resolve property misrepresentation disputes, which usually arise after a seller misleads a buyer during a sale process. There are a number of reasons why…

Bethen Abraham LLB (Hons), LLM
Solicitor

Building disputes – a complete guide for homeowners

Property disputes

Our experienced solicitors help homeowners to resolve all kinds of building disputes, which typically arise from construction projects. Whether your case involves an extension, loft conversion, landscaping, internal structural alterations,…

Nick Southwell BA (Hons)
Partner

Court ruling sees family miss out on £3M inheritance

Disputes

A court ruling has seen a family miss out on a £3 million inheritance following a text message between the testator and his will writer. In a recent High Court…

Simon Arneaud LLB (Hons)
Senior associate, solicitor
Contact us