HomeInsights & thinkingMis-selling case identifies the importance of accurate descriptions when selling horses
Mis-selling case identifies the importance of accurate descriptions when selling horses
17 April 2014
A champion show jumper, who sold an elderly horse to one of her riding pupils, faces an estimated £150,000 legal bill after senior judges upheld the buyer’s appeal.
The buyer, a Mr Palmer, sued international 3-day eventer Pat Muir, claiming that in 2007 she sold him a mount that was unfit for purpose. The value of the claim was for less than £9,000.
Ms Muir insisted that she did not actually own the horse, a 14 year old hunter, and was merely acting as an agent for the buyer in the purchase. She denied responsibility for the horse’s health or that it ‘lacked merchantable quality at the time of sale and was unfit for purpose’.
The buyer initially lost the case but the Court of Appeal has now upheld his appeal opening a new chapter in the enormously costly legal saga.
Mr Palmer argued that he had asked Ms Muir to keep an eye out for a suitable mount for him to use as a novice eventer and initially agreed to pay £5,000 for the hunter in the belief that he was an 11 year old. The price of the horse was later dropped to £2,750 after he learnt that the horse was in fact 14. Once bought, the horse was found to have an abnormal gait which caused him to occasionally lose balance. The horse then went lame and was put out to grass. A vet later declared the horse unsuitable to ride and eventually he was put down in 2008 for medical reasons. A post mortem examination of the animal revealed that one of his front hooves was bigger than the other.
The court was told that the horse turned out to be of unsatisfactory quality and unfit for purpose. It was bought from Ms Muir in the course of her business as a horse trainer and occasional dealer, and the sale was, therefore, subject to statutory implied terms as to quality and fitness for purpose. Ms Muir’s defence was that she did not own the horse and the buyer knew this. She said that she was merely helping him find a horse in response to a request that she should source one.
At the original hearing the judge found in favour of Ms Muir. However, the Court of Appeal said that the vital points in the case were the nature of the agreement and whether the horse was, in fact, defective. Granting permission for a full appeal hearing, the judges concluded that there was a need to establish the actual condition of the horse at the point of sale.
This case is another clear illustration of the need when selling horses to ensure that they are fit for purpose and of a suitable quality for the purchaser’s intended activity.
For further information on any equine related matters, please speak to our agriculture and estates department.
We are delighted to welcome senior associate Adam Hale to our agriculture & estates team this month. Adam, a specialist in agricultural law, estate planning and estate administration, joins the…
For prescriptive rights to arise over land, they have to have been exercised without force, secrecy or permission of the landowner. Winterburn v Bennet In the case of Winterburn v Bennett, the…
The High Court decision in Lancashire County Council v The Secretary of State for Environment is a salutary warning to landowners of the risks of not taking steps to prevent…
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through our website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorised as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyse and understand how you use our website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies but it may affect your browsing experience on our website. You can find our cookie policy here.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for our website to function and enable core functionality such as security and accessibility. These cookies do not store any personal information. You can block these cookies by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.
We use performance cookies such as Google Analytics to help us count the number of visitors and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works, for example, by ensuring that users are finding what they are looking for easily. The cookies collect information in a way that does not directly identify anyone. For more information on how these cookies work, please see our cookie policy.