Horses make up an expanding part of the rural economy but, because they are not usually classed as ‘agricultural’, they often present problems for planning purposes.
Defining agriculture
The definition of what is ‘agricultural’ is given in the Town and Country Planning Act. In terms of horses, the key is whether or not they are “creatures for the production of food or used in farming land”.
This means that only horses kept for food (not in this country!) or for use in farming (eg ploughing) are agricultural animals. The consequence is that, where horses are concerned, you will generally need planning permission unless you can prove genuine agricultural use. By contrast, planning permission is not needed for the use of buildings, structures etc for agricultural livestock.
Planning permission
There are two areas where you may not require planning permission. One is where you wish to use or build structures within the curtilage of a dwelling house where the structure is ancillary to the enjoyment of the house. The other is the use of land for grazing, which applies irrespective of the type of animal.
You will need planning consent if you wish to convert, or change the use of, existing agricultural buildings (eg to stables, arenas or tack rooms). Car parking and other outdoor activities such as horse walkers, turn-out areas, floodlit arenas and gallops will also require consent.
If horse facilities have been established on a property for a number of years you could apply for a certificate of lawful existing use or development (CLEUD). This could result in the use of the building becoming lawful and immune from enforcement action by the local authority.
Any farmer or landowner who is thinking of setting up, or diversifying into, some form of equine use needs to consider planning issues in advance.
For further advice on equine-related matters, please speak to our agriculture and estates team.
We are delighted to welcome senior associate Adam Hale to our agriculture & estates team this month. Adam, a specialist in agricultural law, estate planning and estate administration, joins the…
For prescriptive rights to arise over land, they have to have been exercised without force, secrecy or permission of the landowner. Winterburn v Bennet In the case of Winterburn v Bennett, the…
The High Court decision in Lancashire County Council v The Secretary of State for Environment is a salutary warning to landowners of the risks of not taking steps to prevent…
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through our website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorised as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyse and understand how you use our website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies but it may affect your browsing experience on our website. You can find our cookie policy here.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for our website to function and enable core functionality such as security and accessibility. These cookies do not store any personal information. You can block these cookies by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.
We use performance cookies such as Google Analytics to help us count the number of visitors and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works, for example, by ensuring that users are finding what they are looking for easily. The cookies collect information in a way that does not directly identify anyone. For more information on how these cookies work, please see our cookie policy.