Get in Touch Menu

Health warning for occupiers

08 July 2010

A recent High Court decision has confirmed that owners or occupiers of land adjoining a development site cannot enforce the provisions of a section 106 agreement between a local authority and a developer, even if the developer’s planning obligations will affect their adjacent land.  A Willans Commercial Property Partner reports.

The Facts

  • The case (Milebush Properties Limited v Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council) concerned a section 106 agreement, entered into between Tameside Council and a developer.
  • It granted the claimant, Milebush Properties, a right of way over part of the developer’s land. The developer’s successor refused to abide by the terms (which were set out in the section 106 agreement) and instead, tried to impose new conditions over Milebush’s right of way. Milebush objected and asked the court for the right of way to be granted in accordance with the provisions of the section 106 agreement.
  • Unfortunately for Milebush, the High Court said that, although they were classed as the beneficiary of the right of way provisions, they were not a party to the 106 agreement itself and so had no right to enforce its terms.


  • This decision upholds the general principle of privity of contract in that only parties to a contract can enforce it.
  • What Milebush should have done was to insist that a directly enforceable contract be put in place with the developer at the outset, setting out the exact terms of the grant of the right of way. If that had been done, the contract with Milebush would have been binding on the developer’s successor and any breach would have afforded Milebush the opportunity to take action to enforce their rights.
  • Anyone who owns or occupies land adjoining a development site has the potential to run into similar circumstances. A directly enforceable contract binding on the developer assures land owners or occupiers that their interests have been accounted for and that they will have the option to take legal action at a later stage if the worst happens.


If you need clear and pragmatic legal advice, we’re here to help so please get in touch.

Contact us

Disclaimer: All legal information is correct at the time of publication but please be aware that laws may change over time. This article contains general legal information but should not be relied upon as legal advice. Please seek professional legal advice about your specific situation - contact us; we’d be delighted to help.
Nigel Whittaker BA (Hons)
View profile
Related services
Share this article
Resources to help

Related articles

Changes to company law – what businesses need to know


This week, initial changes to company law – including the biggest changes to Companies House since it began – will start to take effect. Here, our corporate and commercial team…

Chris Wills LLB (Hons)

Unearthing the implicit duty of cooperation in commercial contracts


In the world of business, contracts are the bedrock upon which deals are built. These carefully crafted documents are a testament to the mutual understanding between parties, outlining their respective…

Richard Holland BA (Hons)
Senior associate, solicitor

Why sole director companies should check articles of association


A recent case has highlighted the importance of ensuring a company is incorporated with carefully drafted articles of association, if there is only one director. All limited companies must have…

Helen Howes LLM
Associate, solicitor
Contact us