Back
Get in Touch Menu

Using your own name as a business brand

13 December 2018

Karen Millen is a well-known fashion designer, who had founded the business Karen Millen Fashions Limited. She subsequently sold out, and in doing so, agreed to restrictions for use of her name.

Despite her application for declarations from the court that she could in certain circumstances use her name and apply for trademarks, in 2016 the court upheld that she was restricted in the use of her name for commercial purposes.

In a recent EU trade mark case, the court decided a case between the clothing brand KENZO and Mr Kenzo Tsujimoto (KT) in respect of the right to register a business owner’s name as a trademark. KENZO had opposed KT’s trademark applications on the basis his mark was too similar to the KENZO registered trademarks.

In its decision the court held that, whilst EU law does not permit the owner of a registered trademark to prevent another person from using their own name, at the same time the law does not provide an unconditional right to use their name.

The court highlighted this would not be allowed if it took unfair advantage of, or was detrimental to, the distinctive character or repute of an earlier trademark. In this case, KENZO won.

These cases are a reminder of the importance to those selling businesses of preserving own name rights, and for those buying the business to protect against competition from the seller. They also offer an insight into how the court balances the competing interests, and can be seen as favourable to brand owners who wish to stop competitors claiming own name rights to avoid existing trade mark protection.

Paul Gordon joined Willans from a City law firm in 2005. Specialising in dispute resolution, he has experience in handling a broad range of commercial matters, including intellectual property, director and shareholder disputes, and engineering and construction cases. 

We're here to help

Contact
Paul Gordon LLB
Partner
View profile
Paul Gordon
Related services
Share this article
Resources to help

Related articles

Turning a blind eye: the concept of 'dishonest assistance'

Litigation & dispute resolution

The court has shed light on the legal concept of ‘dishonest assistance’, in the recent case of Group Seven Limited & Others v Notable Services LLP & Others [2019]. By…

Paul Gordon LLB
Partner

Legal brain Q&A: A guide to intellectual property rights

Intellectual property disputes

They say that imitation is the highest form of flattery. But when it comes to intellectual property, a competitor copying your ideas can put your business’s whole operation and finances at…

Paul Gordon LLB
Partner

Disclosure rules shake-up with new pilot scheme

Litigation & dispute resolution

Disclosure is a stage in the litigation process in which the parties have to submit documents which are relevant to the issues in the dispute, even if they are detrimental…

Paul Gordon LLB
Partner
Contact us