Back
Get in Touch Menu

Recruitment roulette? Don’t take the risk

13 November 2018

It may come as a surprise to some, but a person who has not even applied for a job can theoretically bring a discrimination claim in respect of the employer’s recruitment advertisement. Such a claim would be based on the content of the advert or a statement made by the employer in response to an enquiry.

Employers need to carefully consider their job ads to ensure that the language used does not put off any protected groups from applying for the role, nor should the requirements prevent any protected groups from being able to do it. For example, advertising for a ‘young and energetic’ individual could amount to age and/or disability discrimination. Advertising for a ‘waitress’ or ‘salesman’ may amount to sex discrimination.

That said, where there is a necessary occupational requirement, employers can justify what would otherwise be discriminatory criteria. For example, a firefighter (not fireman!) needs to be physically fit, so when advertising for one this requirement can be justified. However, despite the occupational requirement justification, employers should be aware of their obligation to make reasonable adjustments to accommodate disabilities.

When advertising a role, employers should not take a risk, but should carefully consider the content of the job advert. Draw up a detailed written job description, focusing on the skills and experience required for the vacancy. Describe the skills and qualifications that are considered necessary or desirable in a candidate, in order to perform all the duties in the job description. Consult your equal opportunities policy for guidance, and do not include irrelevant criteria. If you think that a criterion which, on the face of it, looks discriminatory criterion, is in fact an occupational requirement, you should seek advice.

Get in touch with us for clear guidance on this topic.

Partner Matthew Clayton is head of our employment law team. He acts for both national and multi-national clients. Leading legal directory Chambers & partners says “clients appreciate his down to-earth, practical and common-sense approach”.

We're here to help

 

Disclaimer: All legal information is correct at the time of publication but please be aware that laws may change over time. This article contains general legal information but should not be relied upon as legal advice. Please seek professional legal advice about your specific situation - contact us; we’d be delighted to help.
Contact
Matthew Clayton MA LLM (Cantab), CIPP/E
Partner
View profile
Mathew Clayton
Related services
Share this article
Resources to help

Related articles

Changes to company law – what businesses need to know

Corporate

This week, initial changes to company law – including the biggest changes to Companies House since it began – will start to take effect. Here, our corporate and commercial team…

Chris Wills LLB (Hons)
Partner

Unearthing the implicit duty of cooperation in commercial contracts

Commercial

In the world of business, contracts are the bedrock upon which deals are built. These carefully crafted documents are a testament to the mutual understanding between parties, outlining their respective…

Richard Holland BA (Hons)
Senior associate, solicitor

Why sole director companies should check articles of association

Corporate

A recent case has highlighted the importance of ensuring a company is incorporated with carefully drafted articles of association, if there is only one director. All limited companies must have…

Helen Howes LLM
Associate, solicitor
Contact us