Back

Imperial Square is partially closed, however our offices remain open. If you are visiting us please access our reception at 34 Imperial Square from the top of the road.

Get in Touch Menu

Private vs common land - use it or lose it

29 November 2016

The High Court decision in Lancashire County Council v The Secretary of State for Environment is a salutary warning to landowners of the risks of not taking steps to prevent land used “as of right” for lawful sports and pastimes for more than 20 years being designated as a town or village green under the Commons Act 2006.

In this case substantial areas of open land were owned by a school. One area had been used for school games and there was a licence agreement to take hay on another part of the land. These areas were used by the general public for recreation and no steps were taken by the school to interfere with that use even when school games were in progress. Furthermore, the public skirted around the playing area but were not told by staff to leave.

An application to register all of the land as a village green was made when the school started to build an extension on part of the land.

In the first instance the inspector at the public enquiry ruled that the land could be registered as a village green. He found the education authority and the head teacher had failed to take steps to prevent or deter recreational use of the land. The High Court agreed with the inspector and also ruled that a licence to take hay was not inconsistent with recreational use of the land.

This problem could have been avoided if the school had maintained notices indicating that the land was private, intended for school use only and that any recreational use required the school’s consent.

The school could (since 10 October 2013) also have deposited a declaration with the local authority making it clear that the land was not intended to be used for recreational purposes. If this process had been available to the school at the relevant time it would have defeated the claim for registration as a village green.

An Oxford graduate with an extensive rural background, Robin is well-known for his agricultural and property law expertise and has many years’ experience in the field. He advises farmers, landowners, rural and equine businesses, having experience of all aspects of agricultural law including the Basic Payment Scheme, agri-environmental schemes, farm business tenancies and sporting rights.

We're here to help
Disclaimer: All legal information is correct at the time of publication but please be aware that laws may change over time. This article contains general legal information but should not be relied upon as legal advice. Please seek professional legal advice about your specific situation - contact us; we’d be delighted to help.
Contact
Robin Beckley MA (Oxon)
Consultant, solicitor
View profile
Robin Beckley, Willans LLP
Related services
Share this article
Resources to help

Related articles

The advantages & traps of option agreements

Agriculture & rural affairs

An option agreement can be utilised when a developer is considering purchasing land for development. It grants them the ‘option’ to purchase land for an agreed-upon price (or price mechanism)…

Adam Hale BA (Hons), TEP, FALA
Partner

Making the most out of your land with an overage agreement

Agriculture & rural affairs

With the current housing shortage, farmers and other landowners are finding that their fields, agricultural buildings and even small parcels of unused scrub land are increasingly being considered for development.…

Adam Hale BA (Hons), TEP, FALA
Partner

Grazing licence or Farm Business Tenancy: Which is right for you?

Agriculture & rural affairs

Grazing licences and Farm Business Tenancies (FBTs) are both occupational arrangements available to landowners – but which is right for you? This will largely depend on the activities to be…

Adam Hale BA (Hons), TEP, FALA
Partner
Contact us