Twitter

For up-to-date news and views, follow our legal team on Twitter. 


twitter logo

 

Press enquiries

For press enquiries please contact:

Felicity McClintock

T: 01242 514000
E:
 felicity.mcclintock@willans.co.uk

Common sense prevails in appeal case

The courts have long been against clauses which limit or exclude a party’s liability and have thus tended to interpret them strictly using a variety of methods, including the contra preferentem rule. This states that where the meaning of a clause is considered ambiguous or uncertain, it will be interpreted against the party who drafted it. However, a recent Court of Appeal decision suggests that the courts are now prepared to take a different approach.

In Persimmon Homes Ltd and others v Ove Arup & Partners Ltd and another (2017), Arup had provided the developers with a collateral warranty, the last sentence of which attempted to exclude liability for any asbestos-related claim. After finding more asbestos than expected, the developers claimed that Arup had been negligent in failing to identify and report this earlier.

The Technology and Construction Court (TCC) held that it was “entirely clear” that the clause excluded all liability relating to asbestos, whether arising from negligence or not. The developers appealed, saying that the clause did not exclude liability for negligence and that the contra preferentem rule should be applied. The Court of Appeal upheld the TCC’s decision and concluded that both the language used by the parties and any application of business common sense led to the same result.

The decision suggests that the courts may be increasingly willing to interpret and enforce exclusion clauses, or indeed any clause agreed by parties of equal bargaining power, and that the contra preferentem rule now has a very limited role in the strict interpretation of commercial contracts negotiated between such parties.

Sophie Martyn is a solicitor in our corporate & commercial team. With a background in science and data, she is naturally analytical and methodical in her approach. She has general corporate and commercial experience, with a particular interest in advising LLPs and start-up companies. Having previously worked in-house, Sophie is business-minded and makes sure she understands the commercial context in which she is providing legal advice to any individual client.

Sophie Martyn
Sophie Martyn
.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)